Blue Guardian vs FundingPips
A side-by-side look at Blue Guardian and FundingPips: what each charges for a comparable challenge, which programs and platforms they offer, and how traders rate them. Every figure is sourced and dated below.
| Detail |  Blue Guardian |  FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest standard challenge | $239 $100K 2-Step · source, 2026-10-19 | $466 $100K 2-Step · source, 2026-10-19 |
| Challenge types | 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, Instant | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Trader rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Reviews | 233 | 1,212 |
| Max allocation | $400K | $400K |
| Platforms | MT5Match TraderTradeLocker | MT5Match TradercTrader |
| Markets | FXIndicesCryptoOther Commodities | FXMetalsIndicesEnergyCrypto |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | United Arab Emirates | United Arab Emirates |
Key differences
- Blue Guardian's cheapest standard $100K evaluation is $227 cheaper ($239 vs $466). Compare the rules attached to each price, not just the price.
- Both firms carry the same published trader rating (4.2).
- Blue Guardian lists 3-Step program that FundingPips does not in our dataset.
- Both offer MT5 and Match Trader. Only Blue Guardian lists TradeLocker. Only FundingPips lists cTrader.
- Blue Guardian has the longer track record, founded in 2021 (1 year earlier).
- Markets listed only by Blue Guardian: Other Commodities.
- Markets listed only by FundingPips: Metals and Energy.
- you want the lower entry fee at the same account size
- a longer operating history matters to you
- you want a 3-Step program
- you trade on TradeLocker
- you prefer a firm with a larger body of trader reviews
- you trade on cTrader
What this comparison does not cover
Drawdown type, daily loss limits, consistency rules and payout terms differ by program and change often, so we do not summarise them here. Before you buy, read each firm's current rules for the exact program and size you want, and check them against our drawdown guide and payouts guide.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian or FundingPips?
At the time we checked, Blue Guardian's cheapest standard $100K evaluation cost $239 and FundingPips's cheapest standard $100K evaluation cost $466. Both firms run discounts, so check the price at checkout.
Which has better ratings, Blue Guardian or FundingPips?
Blue Guardian has a published rating of 4.2 and FundingPips 4.2, according to a Prop Firm Match snapshot. Ratings are one signal; read recent reviews and payout reports too.
Can I use the same platform at Blue Guardian and FundingPips?
Yes. Both list MT5, Match Trader. Platform availability can vary by program, so check the specific challenge.
Is Blue Guardian or FundingPips better for beginners?
Neither is automatically better. Beginners usually do best with a static drawdown, no time limit and a modest account size. Compare those rules on each firm's current program page and read our challenge types guide.
Ratings and review counts: Prop Firm Match snapshot. Fees: cheapest standard (non-promotional) price found on the date shown. Other fields: The Prop Navigator directory dataset. Not financial advice.
