FTMO vs FundingPips
A side-by-side look at FTMO and FundingPips: what each charges for a comparable challenge, which programs and platforms they offer, and how traders rate them. Every figure is sourced and dated below.
FTMO is our featured affiliate partner and we may earn a commission from FTMO links. The comparison below uses the same data fields for both firms.
| Detail |  FTMO |  FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest standard challenge | $560 $100K 1-Step · source, 2026-10-19 | $466 $100K 2-Step · source, 2026-10-19 |
| Challenge types | Not recorded | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Trader rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Reviews | 211 | 1,212 |
| Max allocation | $400K | $400K |
| Platforms | cTraderMT4MT5TradingView | MT5Match TradercTrader |
| Markets | FXMetalsIndicesEnergyCryptoOther CommoditiesStocks | FXMetalsIndicesEnergyCrypto |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Czech Republic | United Arab Emirates |
Key differences
- FundingPips's cheapest standard $100K evaluation is $94 cheaper ($466 vs $560). Compare the rules attached to each price, not just the price.
- FTMO has the higher published trader rating (4.5 vs 4.2), from 211 reviews.
- FundingPips lists 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant programs that FTMO does not in our dataset.
- Both offer cTrader and MT5. Only FTMO lists MT4 and TradingView. Only FundingPips lists Match Trader.
- FTMO has the longer track record, founded in 2015 (7 years earlier).
- Markets listed only by FTMO: Other Commodities and Stocks.
- published trader sentiment is a priority for you
- a longer operating history matters to you
- you trade on MT4 and TradingView
- you want the lower entry fee at the same account size
- you prefer a firm with a larger body of trader reviews
- you want a 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant program
- you trade on Match Trader
- you plan to scale towards a larger total allocation
What this comparison does not cover
Drawdown type, daily loss limits, consistency rules and payout terms differ by program and change often, so we do not summarise them here. Before you buy, read each firm's current rules for the exact program and size you want, and check them against our drawdown guide and payouts guide.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, FTMO or FundingPips?
At the time we checked, FTMO's cheapest standard $100K evaluation cost $560 and FundingPips's cheapest standard $100K evaluation cost $466. Both firms run discounts, so check the price at checkout.
Which has better ratings, FTMO or FundingPips?
FTMO has a published rating of 4.5 and FundingPips 4.2, according to a Prop Firm Match snapshot. Ratings are one signal; read recent reviews and payout reports too.
Can I use the same platform at FTMO and FundingPips?
Yes. Both list cTrader, MT5. Platform availability can vary by program, so check the specific challenge.
Is FTMO or FundingPips better for beginners?
Neither is automatically better. Beginners usually do best with a static drawdown, no time limit and a modest account size. Compare those rules on each firm's current program page and read our challenge types guide.
Ratings and review counts: Prop Firm Match snapshot. Fees: cheapest standard (non-promotional) price found on the date shown. Other fields: The Prop Navigator directory dataset. Not financial advice.
